🔗 Share this article

Sunday 30 January 1972 remains among the deadliest – and consequential – occasions in three decades of violence in Northern Ireland.

In the streets of the incident – the legacy of that fateful day are displayed on the structures and seared in people's minds.

A public gathering was held on a wintry, sunny period in Derry.

The demonstration was opposing the policy of imprisonment without charges – holding suspects without due process – which had been implemented following three years of conflict.

Troops from the elite army unit fatally wounded thirteen individuals in the district – which was, and remains, a strongly Irish nationalist population.

A particular photograph became particularly prominent.

Photographs showed a Catholic priest, Fr Edward Daly, displaying a bloodied white handkerchief while attempting to defend a crowd moving a young man, the injured teenager, who had been fatally wounded.

Journalists recorded considerable film on the day.

The archive contains Father Daly telling a media representative that soldiers "appeared to fire in all directions" and he was "completely sure" that there was no justification for the shooting.

The narrative of what happened was disputed by the initial investigation.

The initial inquiry found the soldiers had been attacked first.

In the negotiation period, Tony Blair's government established a fresh examination, following pressure by surviving kin, who said the first investigation had been a whitewash.

During 2010, the report by Lord Saville said that on balance, the military personnel had fired first and that not one of the individuals had presented danger.

The contemporary government leader, the Prime Minister, issued an apology in the government chamber – stating killings were "unjustified and inexcusable."

Law enforcement commenced investigate the incident.

An ex-soldier, known as Soldier F, was brought to trial for killing.

Accusations were made regarding the fatalities of James Wray, 22, and in his mid-twenties William McKinney.

The accused was further implicated of trying to kill several people, additional persons, further individuals, another person, and an unidentified individual.

There is a court ruling protecting the veteran's privacy, which his legal team have claimed is essential because he is at threat.

He testified the investigation that he had exclusively discharged his weapon at persons who were carrying weapons.

That claim was dismissed in the concluding document.

Material from the inquiry could not be used immediately as evidence in the criminal process.

During the trial, the accused was shielded from sight using a privacy screen.

He made statements for the opening instance in court at a hearing in December 2024, to answer "not guilty" when the allegations were put to him.

Relatives of those who were killed on Bloody Sunday made the trip from the city to the judicial building every day of the trial.

One relative, whose relative was died, said they understood that attending the case would be difficult.

"I can see the events in my memory," he said, as we examined the primary sites referenced in the proceedings – from the street, where his brother was shot dead, to the adjacent the area, where one victim and William McKinney were killed.

"It even takes me back to my position that day.

"I participated in moving my brother and lay him in the vehicle.

"I relived each detail during the testimony.

"Notwithstanding enduring all that – it's still meaningful for me."